25 Messages for someone coming from the outside

Message 1, stay in control, do not do the things you cannot do.

Message 2, when you say something about someone else, make sure that everybody knows them.

Message 3, sit at the sides of the room when not standing, never sit or stand in the corner.

Message 4, if you find yourself in the corner, relax, do not move as soon as you have found yourself there, but follow Message 2 and then make a move.

Message 5, make sure that everyone knows someone else before you say anything about anyone who is not there.

Message 6, also follow Message 5 before you say anything to anyone who is there.

Message 7, never step into a room with less than four corners.

Message 8, accept that everyone is always behaving violently, so be careful and sporadic about when you choose to point this violence out to them.

Message 9, people remember different things and things differently, but do not confuse fact and fiction, evidence can still be interpreted.

Message 10, the eternal light of the sun is a fact.

Message 11, life is not always happening, so do not excuse out of control actions as once in a lifetime experiences.

Message 12, there can be no such thing as a clear message, but this is only sometimes relevant.

Message 13, Message 12 cannot be used to excuse any deprivation of the account; if anything, Message 12 should further stimulate the will to account.

Message 14, there is no clear reason to believe in Message 13.

Message 15, Messages 12, 13, and 14 will take it in turns to be the form to the idea that makes the most sense.

Message 16, in order to better understand Message 15, refer back to the second part of Message 12.

Message 17, thinking yourself into a corner is the more acceptable limit out of the two possible corners you can find yourself in: those to be found in a room, and those found in limited thought.

Message 18, all people are all people, and this means that we should know something, but it is rarely useful in the everyday context that concerns us most of all.

Message 19, do not do all of your sleeping in the night, and do not only wake up in the day, and do not simply reverse this order, either.

Message 20, do not work more than you sleep, and especially do not work when you cannot sleep.

Message 21, do not try to stay awake when you cannot sleep.

Message 22, falling in love once it is too late is preferable to falling in love too soon, although both situations perform the same tragic outcome.

Message 23, do not step into a room where you cannot count all of its corners from the entrance.

Message 24, whenever outside, never exceed the daily limit of five transitions between inside and outside spaces.

Message 25, make sure you turn every potential choice, every likely scenario and every unfinished idea into a best and worst dichotomy and discard all other possibilities in between.

The mythological probability of a Hero (3/3)

The story of a hero begins unsteady in the unmatched

Amid the unhappily made and those made unhappy

When the sonic reference of their proud disagreement

Builds to an unmeant speech that cannot be contained.

From such an unnameable noise, a new name is born

Of a hero who will not speak better than this birth-mark

Whose own turn to speak must only again the unmatched

But a speech that may then in the unmatched, unmatched.

Getting back to non-history (2/3)

There are no more statements.

There are no more people.

There are no more things.

These are the last three statements ever to be spoken by the same person.

They are all three of the things of one person made of no more people.

And they have barely survived in the native meaning of that person no more, but for the exactitude of them. To us.

They are now three times the same thing. Three times over of a person again. Three things out of one having been said and not any one of them.

A people that was up to those things and the person who states them up to no more.

A people of the statement not more than once, whether repeated or not.

All the people of those three statements, said once.

To the one last person to have said something.

A sort of statement of the people that were but did not become.

Re-Stated for the after people. For things after no more things.

So not things of those before things.

So three statements of the state(d) things. But not of the state of things.

And this would be the state.

The things of no more things, stated apart from the people. Altogether, put together, a State.

Like a person. But much more likely to be lost than to get lost.

And three things stated of the people are nothing but stated things of the state(d) people.

The people that are lost before anything begins to get lost.

The people that would be in that state, if it were a state.

They are of the people because they cannot be by the people. There are no more statements.

And of the people of sorted things of a populated thing.

In this case a state people of a state person who has not been leftover, but for statements.

For statements of a person disintegrated in a non-thing said of a not-people.

Three statements, not four statements.

From a State which has always been left. The thing that got over itself, whether lost or not.

A state of not stating. This one, the state of no more statements, not the one before. The one before cannot be stated. And we cannot state.

So to a State, which overlooks things like the overstated.

To be made up or out of three statements, of three things (statements, people and things), by the people of one person, left, overcome.

Not leftover, not come.

By the question of the state which is not the state that has been done.

And the state that has come.

But the undone state of the State that has not been stated, populated, or Stated.

And did also leave in one person at once, of all the people, statements and things.

The person that must have been there. And so the people that must have, too.

But not the people of the statement. And not a double negation.

If in the statement we could have got so far back to going so far back.

So far, everything is back. Nothing anymore.

The statement is it.

The people who cannot be stated and who were not stated in the person who has stated.

But not the person who has been stated.

This is not a thing.

This is not their statement.

There would always now be one too many.

After one. So actually always four statements: the one that has not been left of those that were left.

Far from the same person, stating it, as its end, all at once.

The far gone voice of all three at once, being fourth in line of their out of line outline.

But since up to an unended State of the difference, four cannot be stated for that would be one, too. We are left at three. Whilst not being able to put it simply.

The answerless question of a time between left and come.

Its answerless person. Who faded into the people as they had been led up to him.

It now takes too long to say this, for it to make sense.

For it makes no sense to talk of no more statements, because there are no more statements.

Of the things there are no more, nothing can make sense of saying them in their negative way.

That we have not got over the prefix of a person and the suffix of a people.

The person who went into three states of the end of stated things, and a people that disappeared in a person.

The implication is that this difference is in a number.

What could have been said of the State before the end of the state?

It could have been stated, populated, objectified.

What could have been said of the State before the numerical implication?

All three things at once.

But now having said too many things stated at once.

All three things repeated four times whether or not.

There would not be one person to say it again, but three people.

But the fourth one is the one who is missing.

All three of them.

And they would overhear each other.

They would overhear the person who leaves to the Leaf of State.

The question state is, which again cannot pretend to reveal anything about the state of the question: who could have even heard these last three things ever to be spoken by one person at once?

Who would have even been those people?

Do we have to go looking for 5?

Who has even heard of such a thing?

For now, 3 is the last number.

On SleepLessNess (1/3)

A sleep unaffected by the noises of the night is for those who will not find sleep within the eternal sleep.

Typical differences only really satisfy those who have never felt tired.

All big projects are tiresome for unfinishable.

If only for a worker who might feel restless but not be tired.

So this is the project. A sleep that will work.

Of shut eyes and open ones. Of closed cycles and undreamt ones.

A work that seems lucid, a getting up that knows how to take to a later time to lie down and close its eyes; a sleep that stays awake for an hour beyond the non-hours.

A sleep that can find itself between sleep.

A sleep that knows when it does not sleep.

And all the inimitable dreaming needed to have associated any of that.

To be profound and profoundly lost in all the somnambulant phenomena speaking to itself and speaking in itself.

Where and when sleeping and being awake return by the same difference, are lost for the same purpose, as one or the other, one way or another.

That the dream itself may find time to sleep. To repeat itself in the mourning of the wake state. And remember what it was about, and what it is to be about.

That something as sleepless as being awake would never be restless, never unslept.

To wake up into wake-state and vice-versa.

But the idea of this difference is still not quite there.

As one cycle too many. We have been cyclical, and that is too much. Naming the passions and falling asleep to another person’s thinking.

We are empty enough for the fixed name. But unchallenged for the dreamt up state of dreamt down stating.

Of course, we have not had to sleep much for that. We have not had to wake up too often for that.

We might blame the dreamers for this lapse. We might blame ourselves for waking too early and not seeing it all the way through.

We should perhaps blame each other for not seeing the difference in all its undreamable difference between dreaming and not dreaming.

Since our surfaces are insufficiently lit to see the lack of the animation between them.

There is so much nighttime in our days, and not enough daylight in our nights.

We are always still too full of dreams for a full engagement. For a full sleep – too lethargic.

And so to see this difference as it has not so far been well-rested would be as to not see it, too. As it were not to sleep and all the consequences analogous to that.

To live in the unsleep of change.

But we do not want to do this. We have no need to.

So what is this question of our sleep?

Of being awake too long beyond the dream?

Of going to sleep too early for the better meaning of a pause?

This is the question of our question. How does it make itself up in the meantime, between the alterations by slept and unslept time?

And if I have just asked another pointless question, my next question has to therefore be: how is it that these pointless questions insert themselves into the sleep cycle?

Have I not slept enough? Indeed, I never do.

What more dreams are going to make us a memory of what we have never had? And how many more shall insert themselves so outrageously, and in their outrage dream another type of sleep altogether?

Do we have to sleep more, dream more or wake up more?

Should we not wake ourselves up in this dreamt memorising of things that never were? Are we not responsible for different responses to a dream?

I think it is about not leaving our time alone.

And making it into the work, however analogised.

Perhaps a matter of trusting nonexistence. Like going to sleep for an hour after the mourning.

And not trusting existence as much. The existence of things.

As we dream the almost sleep of what the end of some different days would look like. And that means sleep and non-sleep, of course.

Put our dreams into sleep. Do not go to sleep. But waking up after having done so.

Too much interpretation, and it may go to sleep.

Of course, too much and it may just fall asleep.

A tired end.